Accessibility
Accessibility as design rather than charity: attention tunnels and context-switching costs taken seriously as constraints, and the accommodation-tax myth tested against its honest exceptions.
-
Monotropism, flow, and the real cost of context-switching
Autistic attention is narrow-but-deep, not a focus deficit. Context-switching costs are structural — workplaces that ignore them tax whom they claim to accommodate.
-
The accommodation tax is a myth: neurodivergent-first design helps everyone (and the honest cases where it doesn't)
Designing for neurodivergent users rarely costs the majority anything — mostly the tax is a myth. The honest version names the real tradeoffs, answered with options.
-
Learning design for neurodivergent learners
Most learning design is built for a neurotypical majority, then 'accommodates' everyone else. What changes when we start from neurodivergent cognition.